Site icon Gradient Flow

One simple chart: Who is interested in Apache Pulsar?

Multi-layer architecture, scalability, multitenancy, and durability are just some of the reasons companies have been using Pulsar.

By Ben Lorica and Jesse Anderson.

With companies producing data from an increasing number of systems and devices, messaging and event streaming solutions—particularly Apache Kafka—have gained widespread adoption. Over the past year, we’ve been tracking the progress of Apache Pulsar (Pulsar), a less well-known but highly capable open source solution originated by Yahoo. Pulsar is designed to intelligently process, analyze, and deliver data from an expanding array of services and applications, and thus it fits nicely into modern data platforms. Pulsar is also designed to ease the operational burdens normally associated with complex, distributed systems.

Who else is interested in Pulsar? Karthik Ramasamy, CEO of Streamlio, was kind enough to share geo-demographic data of recent visitors to the project’s homepage:

Figure 1: Apache Pulsar geo-demographic data of visitors. Slide by Ben Lorica, data courtesy of Karthik Ramasamy.


Of the thousands of recent visitors to the site: 33% are from the Americas, 36% from Asia-Pacific, and 27% were based in the EMEA region.

While Apache Kafka is by far the most popular pub/sub solution, over the last year, we’ve started to come across numerous companies that use Pulsar.. It turns out that Pulsar has a few features these companies value, including:

While previous generation messaging systems focused primarily on moving data, newer frameworks like Pulsar add data processing capabilities essential for feeding data into analytics and AI applications. The rise of connected devices, the introduction of 5G, and the growing importance of machine learning and AI will require that companies build infrastructure for capturing, processing, and moving many data streams. And they will increasingly need to perform these tasks in (near) real time. The good news is that critical components for data management, processing, transport, and orchestration continue to improve and automation technologies should ease operational burdens moving forward.

[A version of this post appears on the O’Reilly Radar.]

Related:

Exit mobile version