For those of us in AI, one of the most pressing issues is how the U.S.-led export controls on China’s chip industry will change when the Trump administration takes office in January 2025. The Biden administration has just announced sweeping new export restrictions targeting China’s semiconductor sector. These new measures limit the export of 24 advanced chipmaking tools and high-bandwidth memory (HBM) crucial for AI applications. They’ve also expanded the Foreign Direct Product Rule (FDPR) to curb China’s access to equipment and components made with U.S. technology, adding 140 Chinese entities to the restricted trade list to hinder Beijing’s progress in advanced AI and military modernization.
At its core, this is about semiconductors as the foundational hardware enabling AI capabilities. Among the three pillars of AI – data, algorithms, and hardware – semiconductor technology represents the most defensible competitive advantage for the United States and its allies. The logic is straightforward: while China can eventually develop sophisticated algorithms and amass vast datasets, creating cutting-edge chips requires decades of accumulated expertise and hundreds of billions in investment. By controlling the export of advanced semiconductors and manufacturing equipment, Washington aims to prevent Beijing from closing the gap in AI capabilities that could have profound economic implications.
There’s also a national security dimension. Restricting access to advanced chips is intended to slow China’s development of AI technologies with military applications. Protecting U.S. intellectual property is another critical factor; safeguarding semiconductor IP ensures that investments in research and development yield tangible competitive benefits. For AI teams building applications and solutions, these developments will impact hardware availability, pricing, and supply chain stability—all crucial elements for planning and scaling our projects.
Unlike solar and EVs before it, the West isn’t letting semiconductors slip away to China
The stakes of maintaining this semiconductor advantage are particularly high given historical precedent. In both the solar and electric vehicle industries, Western countries openly shared technology and developed deep partnerships with China, only to see Chinese companies eventually dominate these sectors entirely. This experience offers a cautionary tale about the risks of unrestricted technology transfer, especially in strategically important industries. Unlike those cases, however, the semiconductor industry represents a unique opportunity to maintain Western technological leadership, given the decades of accumulated expertise and massive capital investments required to compete at the cutting edge.
Mixed Results: Assessing the Impact of Export Controls
The effectiveness of these export controls presents a mixed picture. While the recent export controls are a step in the right direction, their effectiveness is a mixed bag. The expansion of the Entity List to include more Chinese companies is a tangible move, limiting their access to U.S. technology and components. This directly affects China’s ability to procure critical AI-related hardware, which is a positive development to U.S. officials concerned about maintaining a technological edge. The restrictions on HBM chips are particularly impactful. By targeting these essential components for high-performance AI systems, the U.S. is strategically hindering China’s capacity to build cutting-edge AI hardware. The expansion of the FDPR further tightens the net by preventing foreign companies using U.S. technology from supplying China, closing potential backdoors.
However, several factors are undermining the intended impact of these measures. Chinese firms have been stockpiling restricted technologies, effectively creating a buffer against the short-term impact of the controls. This stockpiling undermines the immediacy of the restrictions, allowing China to continue its technological advancements despite the new policies. Moreover, the implementation delays between policy announcements and enforcement have given Chinese firms ample time to prepare and adapt. The regulatory complexity of the export controls adds another layer of challenge. Lengthy and intricate rules create confusion, leading to loopholes that can be exploited.
Perhaps most concerning is the challenge of global coordination. While the U.S. has secured cooperation from key allies like Japan and the Netherlands in restricting semiconductor equipment exports, the uneven application of controls across different jurisdictions creates vulnerabilities in the overall strategy. Industry lobbying has also led to exceptions and compromises that risk undermining the long-term strategic objectives of these measures. For AI teams building applications, this regulatory landscape creates significant uncertainty around hardware availability and supply chain stability, making it crucial to develop robust contingency plans.
Predictions and Prescriptions
Despite the current export controls, I anticipate China will intensify its investment in domestic semiconductor production, particularly in high-bandwidth memory and advanced AI chips. This concerted effort could narrow the technological gap we currently hold. Moreover, there’s a real possibility that non-U.S. manufacturers will develop dual supply chains to serve both Western and Chinese markets, undermining the effectiveness of export restrictions. These shifts could lead to increased competition, supply chain disruptions, and higher costs for AI hardware—directly impacting our ability to build and scale AI applications efficiently.
In the AI race, chips are the one advantage China can’t easily replicate
To navigate these challenges and maintain our competitive edge, several strategic actions appear necessary:
- Expand Domestic Semiconductor Manufacturing. Dramatically expand the CHIPS Act funding and broaden industrial policy to accelerate domestic semiconductor manufacturing. This should include aggressive incentives for non-U.S. companies like Samsung and TSMC to establish significant manufacturing capacity within allied nations.
- Simplify Export Control Regulations. Streamline the complex web of export controls to reduce compliance costs and legal risks. The current complexity creates unnecessary compliance burdens for companies while providing opportunities for evasion through technical loopholes.
- Close High-Bandwidth Memory Loopholes. HBM chips are crucial for advanced AI systems, and maintaining control over this technology is vital for preserving Western technological advantages.
- Strengthen Enforcement and Penalties. Implement significant fines and legal consequences for violations to deter non-compliance. Upholding the integrity of export controls ensures a level playing field for all.
- Accelerate Coordination with Allies. Establish a multilateral export control framework with key allies, particularly Japan and the Netherlands. The current patchwork of regulations creates vulnerabilities that Chinese firms can exploit.
The path forward on export controls presents us with stark choices. A completely open approach, as seen in solar and electric vehicles, risks ceding strategic advantages that took decades to build. On the other hand, comprehensive country-wide restrictions would provide clarity but could trigger aggressive countermeasures and accelerate China’s push for self-sufficiency. The current middle ground—targeted restrictions on specific technologies and companies—attempts to thread this needle. But its success hinges on precise execution, consistent enforcement, and sustained international cooperation. The question is, will this middle ground strategy effectively maintain the competitive edge of the U.S. without stifling innovation or provoking countermeasures? The recent Chinese ban on exporting critical minerals like gallium and germanium to the U.S. underscores the potential for retaliatory measures that could disrupt our own supply chains and complicate the strategic balance.
Related Content
- Press release: Commerce Strengthens Export Controls to Restrict China’s Capability
- AI and Digital Currency in the Republican Platform
- TikTok’s Ticking Clock
- Tesla’s Bumpy Road Ahead: Can the EV Pioneer Maintain Its Dominance?
If you enjoyed this post please support our work by encouraging your friends and colleagues to subscribe to our newsletter: