A noteworthy development in AI this year is the introduction of o1, an OpenAI model that stands out for its reasoning abilities and its approach to complex problem-solving. Although many Large Language Models (LLMs) are capable of producing coherent text, o1 stands out by going beyond self-supervised learning, integrating reinforcement learning, employing sophisticated search algorithms, and refining its reasoning iteratively during inference. Here are the main features that make o1 notable:
- Extended Reasoning Chains. Rather than providing short direct answers, o1 generates detailed, step-by-step explanations and solution paths resembling human-style problem-solving.
- Reasoning Behavior. o1 clarifies ambiguous questions, decomposes problems into smaller parts, self-evaluates and corrects its mistakes, and explores alternative solutions upon encountering failures.
- Reinforcement Learning Integration. The model learns through feedback signals (rewards) instead of relying solely on pattern matching from a fixed dataset. This interactive learning loop allows it to refine its policies in response to the quality of its outputs.
- Scaling of Both Training and Inference. Traditional models often improve by making them bigger or training them on larger datasets. In contrast, o1 demonstrates the additional benefit of inference scaling—giving the model extra compute at test time so it can “think more” and produce better solutions.
- Paradigm Shift. By uniting self-supervised pre-training with reinforcement learning, o1 represents an important departure from purely supervised approaches. It suggests new frontiers for AI applications that need advanced problem-solving, adaptability, and robust reasoning.
Within the broader landscape of LLMs, “reasoning” in the context of o1 refers to a structured, iterative, and human-like problem-solving methodology. Rather than merely spotting statistical patterns in vast datasets, o1 traverses a series of cognitive steps—analyzing and clarifying problems, breaking them down into smaller tasks, probing multiple potential solutions, evaluating outcomes, and rectifying errors. By merging search strategies with continuous learning, o1 can adapt to a variety of domains and incrementally refine its outputs, closely mirroring how humans grapple with and solve complex challenges.
Replicating o1
A new paper outlines a framework for replicating the capabilities of OpenAI’s o1 advanced reasoning capabilities, emphasizing the role of reinforcement learning in advancing LLMs. The framework is built upon four core components: policy initialization, reward design, search, and learning. Policy initialization leverages large-scale pre-training and instruction fine-tuning, giving the model a strong “starting brain.” Reward design ensures that the model receives useful feedback signals, both for intermediate reasoning steps (process rewards) and final correctness (outcome rewards). Search mechanisms, such as tree-based or sequential revisions, let the model explore multiple solution paths or refine a single path iteratively. The learning component (e.g., policy gradient or behavior cloning) ingests the data generated by these searches to steadily improve the model’s policy.
A key message of the paper is that scaling computational resources is crucial not only during training but also during inference. While larger model sizes and more training data have traditionally driven progress, o1 reveals that allocating more computational resources during inference—letting the model “think more”—leads to substantive boosts in performance. In other words, the more computation it can use at inference time (when it’s generating an answer), the better the results.
Inference Scaling
Looking ahead to 2025, inference scaling—increasing test-time computation to systematically ‘think harder’—can become a cornerstone technique for producing higher-quality results in AI systems. Specifically:
- Search as “Thinking”. Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), best-of-N sampling, or sequential revision loops let the model try multiple paths before settling on an answer. The paper frames increased inference computation as a form of search, where the model explores a larger solution space to find better answers.
- Empirical Gains. o1’s performance consistently improves with increased inference computation, demonstrating that the model benefits from more “thinking time.” The paper cites power-law-like improvements in quality when more search steps (or candidate explorations) are allowed.
- No New Algorithm, but a Reframing and Shift in Emphasis. While the paper does not introduce a completely new approach to inference scaling, it reframes inference-time search as a key driver of better answers. It also highlights a growing focus on scaling inference—alongside training—as essential for achieving optimal performance.
- Potential Risks. Increased search can lead to over-optimization or distribution shift if the reward model or policy is not well calibrated. The paper also notes that scaling test-time search may result in inverse scaling due to distribution shift. In addition, the computations during inference primarily manifest in the length of the inference chain.
Closing Thoughts
I expect to see other frontier model providers release “reasoning-enhanced” models in the coming months. Future directions include refining reward models for robust generalization to new tasks, integrating multimodal inputs (e.g., images, audio) to handle real-world settings, and ensuring inference remains efficient despite the added complexity of search. Given the interest in autonomous systems, researchers will likely explore agent-like capabilities—where the model learns dynamically from environmental feedback—and to address challenges like distribution shift, safe exploration, and maintaining strong performance when the policy or reward model evolves over time.
These advancements hint at new opportunities for deploying AI solutions in applications like advanced customer service bots capable of handling nuanced queries, sophisticated diagnostic tools for healthcare, and more intelligent automation in manufacturing and logistics. Enhanced reasoning and inference scaling can also improve decision support systems, enabling them to generate more accurate, transparent, and adaptive recommendations. At the same time, organizations must account for increased computational costs during inference and the need to train teams in managing ‘reasoning loops,’ ensuring that real-world applications can take full advantage of these next-generation, reasoning-centric models.
If you enjoyed this post, please consider supporting our work by leaving a small tip here and inviting your friends and colleagues to subscribe to our newsletter: